FEDERAL RIOT ACT

0
140
The DNC, Democrats, Seattle politicians, Antifa, BLM , and the mainstream media call this a "peaceful protest". What on Earth do they consider a riot?

When is a riot not a riot? When Democrats, CNN, and/or MSNBC says so, that’s when. And so far, the riots have been “peaceful” according to the Democrats and their bought and paid for media, which now includes Fox News as the newest member of the Socialist News Cabal of America.

When will the US Gov’t. decide that the rioters are rioters and use the full weight of the Federal Riot Act to charge, arrest, jail, prosecute, and imprison the rioters?

This is a police station that was “peacefully” set on fire by “peaceful protesters”

On April 10, 1968, Congress enacted the Riot Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2101, 2102 (1999), which made it a federal crime “to use any facility of interstate commerce to incite or participate in a riot.” The federal act thus focuses on the individual who crosses a state line for the purpose of creating public disorder. One of the underlying assumptions was that outside agitators play a role in causing modern urban disturbances. The act provides:

(1) Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including, but not limited to, the mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, with intent—

(A) to incite a riot; or
(B) to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot; or
(C) to commit any act of violence in furtherance of a riot; or
(D) to aid or abet any person in inciting or participating in or carrying on a riot or committing any act of violence in furtherance of a riot;
and who either during the course of any such travel or use or thereafter performs or attempts to perform any other overt act for any purpose specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of this paragraph

Shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both [§ 2101].

The act treats those who attempt to commit the offense, as well as aiders and abettors, as principals. Neither presence at (or participation in) a riot nor imminent threat or harm is required. In National Mobilization Committee to End War in Vietnam v. Foran, 411 F. 2d 934 (7th Cir. 1969) and United States v. Dellinger, 472 F. 2d 340 (7th Cir. 1972), the constitutionality of the act has been upheld on the ground that the First Amendment does not protect rioting or incitement to riot.

This law should put thousands of miscreants in jails then as they’ve been using email, text, IM, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, cellphone calls, etc. to plan and organize the multi-city rioting and placement of supplies meant to inflict harm or damage property.

A “peaceful protester” exercising her 1st Amendment Right to freedom of speech by setting a police vehicle “peacefully on fire”.
Welcome to CHAZ/CHOP, coming soon to a city and/or town near you!